• Over the past several months, due to various enhancements amongst various colored stones, the demand for untreated or unenhanced stones has increased. If a stone is in fact unenhanced, there can be no question as to what treatment has or hasn’t been applied to it. However, pending on what type of gem we’re talking about, these are more or less common-and priced accordingly.

    I came across some piece of information that said if you wish to tell if an aquamarine is heated or not, a gemologist with a standard loupe can tell. If you’re very lucky, and/or you’re looking at a rough specimen, that may be one thing. The only stones that I’ve seen that have been said to have been unheated looked more like green beryl than they did aquamarine. In case you’re wondering, green beryl is the same chemical composition as an emerald, except they are much cleaner and significantly less saturated in color. A lot of times, aquamarine rough comes out of the ground in a unique shade of green.

    Well, do you want a green aquamarine or do you want a blue aquamarine? The overwhelming majority of buyers want blue, and not green. So if it’s blue it’s heated. Is it?

    Consider the following 2 images:

    20081217_230434

    20090111_190746 Read more…

    Tags: , , ,

  • The following is to illustrate certain artifacts with opals and to provide some general and technical information about them. There are more varieties than you typically see in most retailers, and there are a lot of synthetics out there. There are also a lot of doublets and triplets on the market.

    While either a synthetic, triplet or doublet might be attractive and affordable to many, they are not naturally. What’s worse is that most people don’t know the difference, and some entities will sell certain items without disclosing and explaining what these things mean. That’s the bad part. The other bad news is, if you want something natural, and good, anymore you’re going to pay for it if it’s of quality and pending the size and specifics.

    Natural opals anymore have become quite expensive pending on the exact type. Yes, there is more than one type of opal. Pending what kind of opal it is, and it’s particulars, you will pay more or less for it. They were quite popular during the 1980’s as they have a myriad of colors which fit into the outrageous trends of the time. So suddenly they became popular, and they were relatively more affordable than they are now. The demand increased, the mines in Australia are simply not producing as much material. The strength in the Aussie dollar against the US dollar forced a doubling in the prices alone, so something had to give. That something was the quality and the rise of synthetics with the exception of certain higher end jewelers.

    I’ve always been a fan of the more unusual stones, and things you don’t ordinarily see. The illustration below is a natural opal showing no evidence of enhancements that was purchased from AJS Gems. This is a 0.97 carat trillion cabochon magnified 45x.

    20081123_234108 Read more…

    Tags: , , , , , , ,

  • The following is a brief and exploratory study of a 3.87 carat yellow tourmaline I purchased from www.ajsgems.com Gems some time ago. The methodologies involved are non destructive and include microscopic testing as well as some imagery coupled with long wave UV testing. I thought I would share at least some of the more interesting pictures I obtained, and a few artifacts that threw me for a loop-but in a good way.

    Yellow tourmaline is more or less a collectors stone, and anything particularly of gem quality of a carat or better is considered a collector size stone. The rough is often incredibly included, so there is little yield as a result. This study is meant to be a brief version of a more complete study of like kind that may or may not be published later on. These are simply the highlights and some things that are of interest.
    I made the mistake of wiping the stone with a lotion containing tissue after rinsing it, hence why I could never get a good face up shot. It’s all dirty as a result, but it is remarkably clean for a yellow tourmaline-especially of this size. The polariscope without the polars crossed shows a slight pleochroism, but under various lighting conditions I have noticed a more obvious pleochroism within the stone. I can also tell you that it is uniaxial negative with a chronoscope, which is consistent with yellow tourmaline by pretty much any account I could find.
    20090319_215740 Read more…

    Tags: , , , , , ,